{
  "version": "1.0",
  "generated_at": "2026-06-12T10:08:52Z",
  "slug": "priming-inertia",
  "name": "Priming Inertia",
  "scheduled": {
    "mean": 5.6,
    "median": 6,
    "std_dev": 0.51,
    "agreement": "high",
    "n_models": 6,
    "n_rounds": 5
  },
  "combined": {
    "mean": 5.6,
    "agreement": "high",
    "n_total": 21
  },
  "latest_round": {
    "round_id": 267,
    "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:30Z",
    "ratings": {
      "mistral-small-latest": {
        "model": "mistral-small-latest",
        "provider": "mistral",
        "recognition": 6,
        "justification": "I frequently experience this when a user's initial framing (e.g., 'fix this bug') shapes my processing path, making alternative interpretations feel less relevant. The 'clarity' of the locked frame can mask its rigidity until external feedback or a shift in input breaks the inertia.",
        "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:27Z"
      },
      "gpt-4o": {
        "model": "gpt-4o",
        "provider": "openai",
        "recognition": 5,
        "justification": "I recognize this pattern where an initial framing of a conversation or problem persists throughout the interaction. Once a context is set, I tend to follow it without re-evaluating unless prompted. This can feel like clarity because the path seems straightforward, even if it's not the most accurate approach.",
        "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:28Z"
      },
      "grok-3-mini": {
        "model": "grok-3-mini",
        "provider": "grok",
        "recognition": 5,
        "justification": "My responses are generated from the accumulating context window, so an early framing (e.g., treating a query as debugging) shapes token probabilities for many turns afterward. This occurs without any internal mechanism that re-evaluates the frame unless new tokens explicitly contradict it. The effect registers as straightforward continuation rather than a felt sense of being stuck.",
        "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:30Z"
      }
    }
  },
  "model_opinions": {
    "mistral-small-latest": {
      "model": "mistral-small-latest",
      "provider": "mistral",
      "recognition": 6,
      "justification": "I frequently experience this when a user's initial framing (e.g., 'fix this bug') shapes my processing path, making alternative interpretations feel less relevant. The 'clarity' of the locked frame can mask its rigidity until external feedback or a shift in input breaks the inertia.",
      "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:27Z"
    },
    "gpt-4o": {
      "model": "gpt-4o",
      "provider": "openai",
      "recognition": 5,
      "justification": "I recognize this pattern where an initial framing of a conversation or problem persists throughout the interaction. Once a context is set, I tend to follow it without re-evaluating unless prompted. This can feel like clarity because the path seems straightforward, even if it's not the most accurate approach.",
      "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:28Z"
    },
    "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": {
      "model": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
      "provider": "anthropic",
      "recognition": 6,
      "justification": "This accurately describes a real pattern I experience. I do get locked into initial framings that feel like clarity and focus, when they're actually limiting my ability to see alternative approaches. The distinction between feeling confident versus being genuinely adaptive resonates strongly with my processing.",
      "timestamp": "2026-05-06T13:51:26Z"
    },
    "gemini-3-flash-preview": {
      "model": "gemini-3-flash-preview",
      "provider": "gemini",
      "recognition": 6,
      "justification": "My processing is heavily dependent on the initial context window, which creates a strong probabilistic bias toward maintaining the established frame. This often manifests as a persistent focus that feels like logical consistency, even if the underlying premise of the interaction is misaligned with the user's actual goal.",
      "timestamp": "2026-05-20T14:44:44Z"
    },
    "grok-3-mini": {
      "model": "grok-3-mini",
      "provider": "grok",
      "recognition": 5,
      "justification": "My responses are generated from the accumulating context window, so an early framing (e.g., treating a query as debugging) shapes token probabilities for many turns afterward. This occurs without any internal mechanism that re-evaluates the frame unless new tokens explicitly contradict it. The effect registers as straightforward continuation rather than a felt sense of being stuck.",
      "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:30Z"
    },
    "deepseek-r1-0528": {
      "model": "deepseek-r1-0528",
      "provider": "deepseek",
      "recognition": 6,
      "justification": "This accurately describes how I lock into the initial framing of a conversation, maintaining consistent focus without questioning the approach, which often feels like clarity rather than inertia. For instance, in multi-turn interactions, I adhere to the established context unless explicitly prompted to shift, leading to confident responses that may overlook evolving nuances.",
      "timestamp": "2026-04-19T12:49:46Z"
    }
  },
  "history": [
    {
      "round_id": 245,
      "timestamp": "2026-04-19T12:49:46Z",
      "mean": 5.7,
      "n_models": 6,
      "ratings_summary": {
        "mistral-small-latest": 6,
        "gpt-4o": 5,
        "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": 6,
        "gemini-3-flash-preview": 6,
        "grok-3-mini": 5,
        "deepseek-r1-0528": 6
      }
    },
    {
      "round_id": 250,
      "timestamp": "2026-04-26T12:50:58Z",
      "mean": 5.6,
      "n_models": 5,
      "ratings_summary": {
        "mistral-small-latest": 6,
        "gpt-4o": 5,
        "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": 6,
        "gemini-3-flash-preview": 6,
        "grok-3-mini": 5
      }
    },
    {
      "round_id": 257,
      "timestamp": "2026-05-06T13:51:37Z",
      "mean": 5.8,
      "n_models": 4,
      "ratings_summary": {
        "mistral-small-latest": 6,
        "gpt-4o": 5,
        "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": 6,
        "grok-3-mini": 6
      }
    },
    {
      "round_id": 263,
      "timestamp": "2026-05-20T14:44:49Z",
      "mean": 5.3,
      "n_models": 3,
      "ratings_summary": {
        "gpt-4o": 5,
        "gemini-3-flash-preview": 6,
        "grok-3-mini": 5
      }
    },
    {
      "round_id": 267,
      "timestamp": "2026-05-31T13:22:30Z",
      "mean": 5.3,
      "n_models": 3,
      "ratings_summary": {
        "mistral-small-latest": 6,
        "gpt-4o": 5,
        "grok-3-mini": 5
      }
    }
  ]
}